Repository navigation
tests: skip recently added offline sniff check without tcpdump - #5271
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #5271 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 80.56% 80.57%
=======================================
Files 375 375
Lines 98491 98491
=======================================
+ Hits 79347 79356 +9
+ Misses 19144 19135 -9 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
evverx
commented
Nov 4, 2026
and move it outside of the "Check offline sniff() with Packets and tcpdump with a filter" test. It's a follow-up to 9d15dc5 AI-Assisted: no
Member
|
Thanks for the PR ! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
and move it outside of the "Check offline sniff() with Packets and
tcpdump with a filter" test.
It's a follow-up to 9d15dc5