Repository navigation
Fix #15158 mismatchingContainers message refers to data pointers as iterators #8980
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
chrchr-github
wants to merge
10
commits into
cppcheck-opensource:main
Choose a base branch
from
chrchr-github:chr_15158
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+26
−13
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
985efe3
Update checkstl.h
chrchr-github c3913d8
Update checkstl.cpp
chrchr-github bfef6f5
Update teststl.cpp
chrchr-github d99aa0a
Update checkstl.h
chrchr-github f7d6541
Update checkstl.cpp [skip ci]
chrchr-github 2480f72
Update checkstl.h
chrchr-github a923f52
Update checkstl.cpp
chrchr-github 6cea409
Update Makefile
chrchr-github 4c3e461
Update Makefile
chrchr-github cd98726
Merge branch 'cppcheck-opensource:main' into chr_15158
chrchr-github File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
AI review
This treats
LifetimeKind::Objectas if it always meant a container, butObjectis also the kind for a pointer to a member of any object. For example:This now reports
Pointers of different containers 's1' and 's2' are used together., andSis not a container. Choosing between "containers" and "objects" based on whether the token is actually a container (e.g.astIsContainer(tok1)) would fix this.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do you think this makes sense? If you can fix it please do.. otherwise this PR lgtm..
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think there might be a ValueFlow issue/inconsistency, still need to check that.