From 67f373c4ec297f2ad2f40d95ace751887034afa7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Otavio L." <220527245+otavio-l@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2026 18:03:51 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] Fix grammatical error in section 2.3

Error context:
"studies on the loan data and county data described in Section 1.2 are would both be considered observational, as they rely on observational data"

Correction:
"studies on the loan data and county data described in Section 1.2 are both considered observational, as they rely on observational data"
---
 data-design.qmd | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/data-design.qmd b/data-design.qmd
index 21757356..e48c69b6 100644
--- a/data-design.qmd
+++ b/data-design.qmd
@@ -735,7 +735,7 @@ Ultimately, this is a difficult situation where we cannot perfectly protect both
 ## Observational studies {#sec-observational-studies}
 
 Studies where no treatment has been explicitly applied (or explicitly withheld) are called **observational studies**\index{study!observational}\index{observational study}.
-For instance, studies on the loan data and county data described in @sec-data-basics are would both be considered observational, as they rely on **observational data**.
+For instance, studies on the loan data and county data described in @sec-data-basics are both considered observational, as they rely on **observational data**.
 
 ```{r}
 #| include: false